Vincent wrote: ↑Tue Jun 21, 2022 1:51 pm
I also agree with you that I should have just said that I couldn’t edit my post immediately after liking Robin’s because I wasn’t settled yet.
Well, you should have said something like that IF it was true and IF that was what you were trying to say.
At this point, i'm still not sure that's the case.
The reason for that is that
you just did it again.
You said
again that the low battery was "legitimate reasons". But you
also implied that watching the movie was not. One one hand you're saying "i wanted to do it asap but i couldn't". On the other hand you're saying "i took my time". Yet you
still don't acknowledge, resolve nor explain the apparent contradiction between those two things.
So i still don't know what was your point with that post.
And i strongly suspect that you didn't actually have one. It seems to me that you wrote that as if you were thinking out loud for yourself on the thread (an exemplar thread), sequencing things without articulating them, and without an actual idea of what you were trying to say.
And i suspect the reason you did that is because you don't feel you HAD TO have a point and you expect us to fill the blanks and "figure it out" for you instead, for the exact same reason you don't feel you have to write without making sentence fragments, and expect us to do the work of mentally reconstructing your syntax ourselves.
Am i wrong here
Amy ?
I gave details on why I wasn’t settled in the original post, but it was information that was never asked for. Which means that, yes, I was just thinking out loud, and I can not give a valid reason for doing that.
I’m sorry I’m repeating myself so much, but I want to understand where the contradictory information is confusing, so I can clarify it.
When I first liked Robin’s response I was in the mood to edit my post _at that time_. However, I couldn’t yet because I was leaving soon (and my phone was about to die anyways). By the time I got home and was settled (and could charge my phone), I _no longer_ felt like editing my post asap. Instead, I watched a movie first.
Basically, I wanted to edit my post asap only when I first saw Robin’s response. After being out for a bit, however, I felt like relaxing at home first _instead_. You’re right though, that sequence of events isn’t necessary, nor is there any point in saying that I changed my mind. It just adds unnecessary confusion for others. I also _assumed_ it would be obvious that I was just saying that I changed my mind, which it wasn’t.
Also, while I did not consciously try to make sentence fragments, doing so anyways showed a reoccurring pattern of carelessness. This, in turn, made it harder for everyone else. I also assumed that my syntax would be understood just because I understood myself, and was therefore not being considerate of others.
I was conscious in checking if my sentences were too long, but not checking for fragments after is inexcusable. I tend to write how I speak in my head naturally (usually I’m ‘rambly’), and edit mostly after. I think that because I’m a fast talker, that I’m prone to underestimating the length of a sentence unless I go back and check. I then overcompensated (again) and failed to actually be thorough or clear in what I was saying.