Kubrick

[Roshan]

With T frame...

is doing 60 takes of the same thing and narrowing it down more like getting to the impact (StrEngth) through convergence than the other way around?

[Roshan]

My understanding of 2001--which, yes I first saw at around 10 years old and yes it rocked my world, no pun intended--was that the monolith represented TEchnology and we are just apes with rocks whether we send ourselves through TImE warps or not.

Leaning back to TeNi, with an Akhnaton cherry on top.

Well, I will get the earbuds and...

[Vincent]

I'm way behind with the materials, i only took a quick look at Akhromant and i'll need to reread the thread when i'm more rested but i can already say this:

Ti frame, Beta quadra and activity partner with me for Kubrick all seem pretty unlikely to me.

Actually, and at least for now, i have a hard time seeing him as anything but gamma.
And if not gamma, my next guess would probably be evolutionnary SiTe, before anything in alpha or beta quadra.

I'll watch more tonight and i'll download the rest to be able to watch it from work.
tbcd.

[Roshan]

I saw this a few years ago and just rewatched. Fascinating confirmation of T and more.

[Roshan]

Must see. I think probable SiFe 'Collative Learning' cracked Kubrick's code.

[Roshan]

But when Kubrick pops up round 22" he once again strikes me very much as gamma SF.

[Roshan]

Reconsidering to FiSe atm, creative and with a Te pipeline (this goes beyond 'all functions developed'). Exertion of will and force with straight forward movement coming from extremely highly discriminating preferences leads to experience of the InfiNIte and illuminatIoNs. He senses Ni. Ron Ager ("Collativer Learning") gets him so well because they're quasis, so he can process what's going on with him clearly but impassively.

Again, that's 'atm'. But Ni agenda really makes sense (but then why not TiSe, what's the difference with Tarkovsky's 'highly discriminating preferences?', why is he Ti and upper slot Fe...?)

* * *
Interestingly, I found Collative Learning when I was wondering what 2001 meant having not seen it in ages, and I've rarely watched it since I'm just not much of a 'film buff' these days. But he just started uploading these new ones on The Shining two weeks ago.

[Roshan]

He really seems atm to me like a Ji using SpacE and StrEngth to make real his iNtuItions of the InfiNIte. In the photographic self-portrait here, he looks TiSe to me. The other photographs are also very interesting. How two men next to each other in the crowd recede into being two others, the seond with 'four eyes', the third with one; how you see the shadow of the roller coaster on the little girl's face...his Ni does not seem instrumental. He seems to be genuinely immersing himself in another dimension revealed inside of SpacE.

Of course if DG's TeNi creative....

I never suggested SeFi with a pipeline because I can't see Ti PolR as a chess master but there was a reason he was in Marsha's tub....It's very hard for me to hear those audio interviews without earbuds and I haven't gone out in two days; presumably they should shed some light. (No pun intended).

[Roshan]

He is overwhelmingly thought to be NiTe both in MBTI and socionics, including on the16types.info--though there is no convo nor are the 'big wigs' on this thread.

The second photo provided does look Ni dom, but the two also don't look much like other pictures I've seen. I thought he was too Se heavy and organic for Ni dom, pipeline schmipeline, and also, upon further consideration now, his Si too consistent for just role (which should be the death knell for TeNi).

Mind you, he is also pretty universally considered to be 5w4 while we see him as an 8 with 5w4 fix and the odds are in our favor.

[Roshan]

Much is made of the Kubrick stare, which struck me as FiSe *death stare* that everyone says is NiTe and/or Ben Shapiro style TeNi , so that is to say gamma "J". Fortunately someone threw in Ben Shapiro there to corroborate.