David Byrne (Talking Heads)

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

Which after all is what Threes want.

To impress you.

At the end of the day David Byrne still is, beyond a shadow of a doubt, The Extraordinary Ordinary. 3.
Last edited by Roshan on Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:43 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

"This is what made me think synflow likely Sp/So:"




Holy shit. At about 1'10" he actually goes from that stylized kabuki-esque Clark Kent automaton very 'organically' into fetal position.

What is sp/so about this (beyond the sheer imitation of all that is both normal and fashion) is that 'we are animals'. It's almost like a chart of 'devolution' from human to embryo, like the opposite of those charts you see where the primate stands up straighter and straighter til it's a human.
Last edited by Roshan on Tue Dec 14, 2021 12:18 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

I mean I want to be clearer here.

First of all, I did watch the second interview video before the OP one, so the NOT sx last was glaringly obvious. And actually his creepazoid presence in Once in a Lifetime was also, though I felt there was some kind of problem with sp/sx 5w6-3w4-9w1, like if he's a social last Five why is he so...whatever it is that he is. How is that him?

The thing that really screamed confirmation sp/sx in Once In a Lifetime was the 'water going underground'. That IS sp/sx within 'the flow'.

So when I say this is 'the animals' I mean Gray's sp/so animals (from 6 Buddhist realms with sx/so the gods, sp/sx demons, so/sp titans, so/sx humans,sx/sp hungry ghost), and that doesn't preclude its ALSO being very sp/sx.

What it does highlight is that Gray is right that 3 corresponds to social. Byrne is very social last but as a Three he can't truly be.

Another thing is that this 'blue' Byrne presents us with is quite Beta. We're all in and out of the same interstices between birth and death, we're all in some sense one person.

Reminding me of his dual, probably the greatest American pop song writer. But this one's not so poppy. Or so well known.

Last edited by Roshan on Tue Dec 14, 2021 12:42 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

So, atm I say:

David Byrne sp/sx 3w42w3-5w64w5-9w11w2, started as 3 @ 9 shock point dweller hanging on for 'dear life', going through the mechanical motions to fake til make, much healthier now. Also. TiNi but now with developed Se and TeSi shadow.

How long should this moment last?

hmmm...there is no hmmm emoji. And no peering professor either.

:|

Vinceeeeeenzo.....
Last edited by Roshan on Tue Dec 14, 2021 12:31 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Anthony
Posts: 1037
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2021 2:13 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Enneagram Core: 9w1
Cognitive Type: TiNe

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Anthony »

You don’t think double (4w5)? After going through this material he seems so…’precious,’ like rarefied metal, made in a lab, can’t touch him without a violent explosion of extraterrestrial sensitivity (despite his 9w8, I recall getting this vibe even from some of Vincent’s photos, but less than with Byrne).

I’m alright with the entire rest of the typing.

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

Well, what I meant was that it is very Fe > Fi.

We have seen this with Eliot too. No matter how Fourish he gets 'it's not (truly) personal'.
Last edited by Roshan on Tue Dec 14, 2021 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

Anthony wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 12:46 pm You don’t think double (4w5)?
No, offhand I don't. His stuff is so positive, upbeat, and catchy. Like I said earlier, Abercrombie and Fitch salesman from Mars.

Compare Into the Blue to your road kill films.

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

Not saying you're not pointing to something important here Anthony. It's just that my sense is it's a whole area of inquiry opening up about how we understand the types in synergy with each other and with multiple factors such as health level, 'organic' factors such as Asperger's, the role of the Zeitgeist in how someone presents, etc, rather than him moving further into 4 rather than to 2.
Last edited by Roshan on Tue Dec 14, 2021 1:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Anthony
Posts: 1037
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2021 2:13 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Enneagram Core: 9w1
Cognitive Type: TiNe

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Anthony »

Roshan wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 1:35 pm Not saying you're not pointing to something important here Anthony. It's just that my sense is it's a whole area of inquiry opening up about how we understand the types in synergy with each other and with multiple factors such as health level, 'organic' factors such as Asperger's, the role of the Zeitgeist in how someone presents, etc, rather than him moving further into 4 rather than to 2.
I understand 🙂👍

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: David Byrne (Talking Heads)

Post by Roshan »

Most auspiciously toob proferred this unto me...

def not double 4 wings!

And he wasn't kidding about the opening of The Big Country.

Got me to thinking an alternate name for 359 could be "Ghost and the Machine".


Post Reply