Re: A Tale of Two Sixes (?)
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:54 pm
Weill, i had to leave in a hurry, so i replied to agree about the typing itself and i intended to go back to the rest of the post later tonight.Roshan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:48 pm Any particular reason you chose not to like that post (unlike the following one) and to only quote the first half? I'll delete this but my comments on the disintegration dynamics of Six itself throughout this thread have been completely ignored. As if the postings themselves didn't exist. And I've taken great care to think and write them out and they're fairly original and hardly invisible.
Roshan wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:37 pm "
Pinned by Sydney Watson
Sydney Watson
2 weeks ago (edited)
Jack and I exchanged some nice messages over this situation in order to resolve it the day after this incident. I was absolutely prepared to have this situation fade away, to not exacerbate anything. I've been off the Internet for about a week. But I am quite disappointed by what I've heard and feeling as though I've been thrown under the bus. There is also the matter of past writing which is a whole matter unto itself. In the end, drama is lame. But, I'd prefer to set the record straight and not be painted unfairly.
Elijah and I have spoken a lot about this. Initially we wanted to de-escalate. But, given the new information, we're totally united and will be discussing this in full detail when You Are Here is back January 3rd. Thanks for all the love. You are superstars."
Okay.Vincent wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:12 pmWeill, i had to leave in a hurry, so i replied to agree about the typing itself and i intended to go back to the rest of the post later tonight.Roshan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:48 pm Any particular reason you chose not to like that post (unlike the following one) and to only quote the first half? I'll delete this but my comments on the disintegration dynamics of Six itself throughout this thread have been completely ignored. As if the postings themselves didn't exist. And I've taken great care to think and write them out and they're fairly original and hardly invisible.
It's the same thing with the previous posts. I read them with a pretty bad headache this morning, realized they were very important and i would have to reread them. I intended to like them (and most likely to reply to them too) after i reread them carefully.
Well you and I got caught up in a lot of issues in the pm chat so the whole issue of what was being 'ignored' didn't really hit me until Vincent 'did it too'.Anthony wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:29 pm I didn't intend to ignore those posts either.
I was READY to talk about E6 since I presumed that you meant Sydney was the So/Sx 6w7-2w3-9w1 ('girl in thumbnail') which is why I began writing about 6<-->3 in my first post, but then when I finally responded to you after your slew of replies, I 'went along' with you in ironing but Sydney's type. Sorry
Thank you.Roshan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:29 pm Okay.
I agree they have to be read carefully before they're commented on, headache and rush or no.
That's why at least liking them or (god forbid) a less prosaic emoji would have helped.
I don't feel the decision not to do this was devoid of avarice either but okay, I said it.
Hope you're feeling much better.
Not really. My intent was merely to suggest the 92 genders as a potential motive for Sydney launching the invasion of Normandy Beach.