Roshan wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:42 pm
That was an excellent article. Actually I read it some time ago when I was curious about the allegations against Corbyn. Which brings me to another question.
Vincent, when you say you fact-checked him, is not the whole larger point (I mean really big picture) that that's often not possible?
I just skimmed over that article, and it does seem very good to me too. And i really don't get the same impression i got from the first video.
My issue with it wasn't so much the fact checking itself (even if i still wonder when the Soviets used their own civilians as human shields during Operation Barbarossa). It was also the accumulation of "i can't corrobate this BUT i'll insinuate it anyway" and the tendency to overcollapse everytime it serves the russian narratives.
That and some pieces of what appears to me to be twisted logic. For example, unlike him i do see quite a few reasons for the Russians to not want to open humanitarian corridors too early when they are fighting against guerilla-ready paramilitary groups and negotiating with the ukrainian government. And i suspect there is a LOT of wishful thinking in his take on the rupia thing.
But yes i certainly agree that a LOT of this we can't know and check at all,
Even more so in the second video btw. I have absolutely no idea if he is right or wrong about that. If i trust my Te polr canary in the coal mine, i would guess he is probably right actually.
Now, if you look up the Duran on quasi-wikis you will find they are far right. That article wasn't written by anyone even remotely far right. Isn't that the whole point of the info wars that there's so much we can't know the more we become infomatons?
Well, even from the first two videos, he didn't seem far right to me. I felt there was quite a lot of deceit, but not that kind of crypsis. And actually, he reminds me quite a bit of a leftist i met years ago who was going crazy about "world affairs" at a time when most people only accessed the internet from cybercafes.