Terra Incognita

Roshan wrote: ↑Sun Oct 24, 2021 8:54 pm

So I should take ^ that as a yes Anthony?



As in, you see 3w2 as more of the 'heartthrob' than 2w3?

Yes.

Do you disagree with the characterization of E2 as 'most seductive' and the correlation with sx/so, and of 2w3 archetype of Eve and the Apple, Anthony?

No, but I see 'most seductive' and 'Eve and the Apple,' as different than 'heartthrob.'

'Heartthrob' is also a 'superstar,' one [a male] who is admired and desired for his good looks.

I barely know any of these guys, but I can almost guarantee you that not a single one is 2w3 lead and probably not even 2w3 fixed:
https://www.thequiz.com/pick-your-favor ... eartthrob/

Okay, Anthony, but the reason those kinds of male stars become famous is because of the removed quality of 3, which makes it easier for them to project and for the camera to create an image on something that has a strong 'empty canvas' element to it. That's what makes 3w2 the 'charmer', there is a chameleonic creating something out of nothing aspect to it. Of course there are exceptions like the probable 3w2 Robert Plant, but 2w3 is usually much warmer than 3w2, and the 'host' is not the best name. "Bestower", in contrast to 2w1 "Servant" is probably better, and very often the gift the 2w3 bestows is itself. So, sticking to males, Neil Diamond is 2w3 fixed, John Travolta is 2w3...