Terra Incognita

Anthony wrote: ↑Sun Jan 16, 2022 9:52 am Okay, so if I'm understanding correctly, Jack Murphy is another one of these 'masculinity influencers' out of the Manosphere/Red Pill community(?) who charges lonely, disaffected men very high prices for common-sense advice on dating and being a 'real man.'

You're understanding this part correctly but lacking the dimensions of it, which are epic. Jack has been raking it in, apparently having refashioned himself as "Irish". His fall has been into the dark matter. This is very low Six at Three (esp with 3). The narcissism and fakery are worse than 3 lead and aren't tolerated as long because their anxiety doesn't allow them to fake well for long. Somehow the self-abasement of 6 L9 just comes.

Jack's site has been hacked and his clients have been doxxed. They have quit in droves. Photos of heavy S&M gear have (unsurprisingly) been revealed. A former client has complained he warned him two years ago about potential security breeches of the site. It appears he was the target of a criminal investigation in his former life in the field of (conventional) education. There is a reddit thread and a fake website mocking him. I'm sure there is more and will be more. It is just astonishing how quickly and thoroughly this self-demolition job happened. But none of this was reflected in the materials I'd provided so yes, you understood.

What you didn't understand was I highlighted the video I did because I was specifically interested in the creator, but should have specified I meant Star Wars Girl, not Sydney.



But instead of adhering to that role as strictly as possible, he counterphobically chose to write a blog article on the erotic pleasure of cuckoldry—the "courage in transparency" a la 6<-->3, expecting others to understand that, despite his sexual preferences, he still can be and IS "a true man."

Hmmm..yes, but people would dig it up anyway now and again and he would grumble. This time--and as "Star Wars Girl" correctly points out, it was the second time in one sitting--he went off about it.

Star Wars Girl is so far the only one I've seen to point this out--the other 'creators' I've seen being Sean in two videos plus one other---but my very strong sense from looking at comments is her take IS way out of the box. And she's right--Jack is being blamed exclusively unfairly, Sidney and Elijah are being cut too much slack. This perception seems pretty "universal". Whence the cataclysmic fall from grace.

The reason for it is the dynamics of low 6 itself. It manages to involve everyone in making itself a public scapegoat. Law of Inertia: if that swashbuckling public object (6 at 3), that loose cannon, hits L8 hysteric, that object will stay in motion until it gets properly abased at L9. And obviously, there is an arbitrariness to the scapegoating process. The scapegoat is a stand in carrier for the collective shame. Who elevated him to begin with, after all?

But since the Internet is the Internet, and since cuckoldry is cuckoldry, he got publicly humiliated for it and reactively freaked out at Sydney Watson when it was brought up.

When she brought it up the second time in one sitting with a gloating look in her eye while playing dumb and the actual show host (Elijah), who could have interceded then and there and smoothed it out, did nothing.

I think it seems like Sydney might be a 2 or a 9 since, while she presumably understood the essentials of Jack's situation, she 'innocently' brought up the article as some sort of imagistic power maneuver "as a woman"—at least, it could APPEAR that way, and it may very well be the case.
However, it also seems she felt she was tomboyishly "hanging out with the guys" and brought up the article to tease him, not fully understanding how bothersome he actually found it.

tbc she didn't technically exactly
'bring it up'. She just 'had to' read all the superchats. But she understood she was supposed to be allowed to bother him. Like I said, I saw her once before--in a very long, drawn out interview with Kyle Rittenhouse. I don't think she's a 2 or a 9. Or 6 fixed. Or social first. I think she's more likely a 7 with 1 or a 1 with 7 sp/sx with 3w4. She seems intent upon causing trouble as a moral imperative, while bringing very little except raw (but contained) sexuality and poise to the table.

But again, the girl I'm really interested in typing is Star Wars Girl, the creator of the video. I know there's little of Sidney in this video, but so/sx 6w7-2w3-9w1 still seems like a genuinely terrible typing for her, no?