Terra Incognita

What's her ct and complete E? She wrote the article, Martine Rothblatt, a Founding Father of the Trans Empire and this is her blog. You can use any other materials you want; the posted video, the Rothblatt article, and a minimal cursory overview of her blog are mandatory. Vote by noon, NY time, Sunday October 23.

"Paintings, like dreams, need to be born for their own sake. As an Artist, it is my responsibility to hone the skills of my craft. Beyond this, I must learn how to see, how to listen, how to be still and how to allow the best and worst of life to come through me without being devastated in the process. It is both my work and my offering of appreciation to become an optimum environment for the creative spirits who have chosen me as their host of expression.

To have been chosen for the art of portraiture, makes me resplendent with joy.

- Jennifer Bilek"

https://www.jenniferbilek.com/

#2. My typing is SO/sx 5w6-2w1-9w8. This stacking puts her very strongly in the sp/so<-->so/sx stream. She appears to be 5 all the way in 6 but I'm not positive about that, and less so about the other subwings. I do feel very confident 5 is leading. [so/sx] 5 is frequently mistyped as 7.

I am far from sure about the ct but she seems to be Pi lead with some very heavy movement between the first and fourth slots--something young Luc Sante-ish about her could easily be Si lead--as well as a creative subtype. Her desire to become 'an environment' also smacks of Si >>Ni, but....In any case, her portraiture really makes sense with Fi agenda.

#3 Here in this one (which I've just seen for the first time) the 9 seems all the way in 8 and the 2 all the way in 1, but I'm gonna say in that case it'll be 5w64w5.She is genuinely uncomfortable in the public eye; with so much guttiness she has to have some more withdrawn factor. Also, whence all that sense of alchemical transmutation if she doesn't look into the Hole? I may be grasping at straws but...in any case, she seems like a gut type here til toward the end when she loosens up and then the 'head buzz' comes back. I'm guessing this is because of a withdrawn subwing on the lead. But is it enough for both double head lead and [so/sx]?

And also commonalities with Katie Halper are quite obvious here. The more important question is, what about the differences? (Bearing in mind she is now 63 and Katie is twenty years younger).

#4. (The visuals aren't hers).

She must be ST. Below, she sees her gnosis as something she was trained/trainedherself to have. She also sees it as a focus on what's 'out there', and as a job.

The previous video already made it pretty clear she ain't no Se inferior. I can see why one could have thought FeNi there though, because she seemed very beta-ish, only what it seemed to me was actually more SeTi. Which I guess must be the SiTe shadow stack? She seems too uncomfortable in her own body for a beta extravert..

I gotta say she makes one mighty crusty Delta introvert, tho.

#5 Ugh, wait...it was already getting hard to stick with the 5 leading but are she and her courage muscle a 6?

@13'18", 29'52", 55'21", 59'39".

She is doing this talk via remote and she isn't reading so she is quite at ease. She also isn't wearing her glasses.

Hmmmfff, she is going to be even trickier than i thought...

I did consider 6 leading at some point before i voted but i was pretty positive and confident about 5 leading when i did. Not so much anymore...

And ct wise, i'm starting to wonder if she might actually be beta, not just in "beta aura". SeTi and NiFe both seems Vincent impossible but maybe TiSe isn't (still pretty sure that she is ST at this point btw). I thought "Eleventh hour" was Ni role but i'm starting to see an argument for Ne polr:Ni agenda...

Anyway, i'm not done with the videos and i really need to watch more.
tbcd.

Vincent wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 12:39 pm

but maybe TiSe isn't

My emoji was just to reflect the general frustration with her typing, but are you sure you wish to go down the route of typing her with Tulsi Gabbard, Tarkovsky, and all the tai chi masters you used to painstakingly illustrate how graceful this type is?

ps But TeSi IN TiSe aura seems possible. Kinda maybe sorta? The person the sum total of all the different Jennifers (because the issue wasn't the glasses) is starting to most remind me of is this one*, if he had the courage to go that extra step into the unknown. Perhaps her painting is finding Fi, rather than 'just' agenda, and attempting to really live it. And perhaps the overwhelm she fears in her art (articulated again below) is Fi inferior and Ni PolR. And so it takes time, which she uses very well, being Te and SI first and second slots.


I believe my work as an artist is to allow life to come through me in all its beauty and horror and not be devastated by it. Life is tremendous, learning to allow it all through takes time. One has to build their stamina for allowing life to come through them and allowing life to take the shape it desires in art.

*down to the chalk on blackboard voice and the intermittent bouts of maniacal cackling and/or innocence.

In fact, when she goes off on the purported sexual humiliation of Jada Pinkett Smith in the link above, she, like him, does not traverse the line into true synthesis. Jada and Will both got creamed and part of it was because Jada took it upon herself to make her love affairs public and it was so obvious how much of her lapdog Will was at the Oscars. Their marriage cosplay isn't THAT different from these menopausal sudden onset rich guys who go trans, it's part of a continuum of performative degradation of sexuality, of fetishized role playing, but Jennifer can't go there. There are other places she can't go either. I mean, it's all about the men appropriating womanhood (basic radfem angle) but the explosion in trans cases has been with girls. Etc.