Alex Jones (Infowars)
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 7:45 am
Alex Jones is a TiSe creative subtype, with heightened Se and in TeSi shadow. This gives him an unusual presentation for TiSe, but you can see in the footage in the post below from when he was younger that he seemed more TiSe. Since we've known him as a public figure he's had the hard-hitting style of a martial TeSi instead of the more suave and debonair presentation of TiSe.
What is immediately obvious in this Tucker Carlson interview is his ability to predict future outcomes, associated with fully developed Ni. This "prophet" aspect of him is inextricably enmeshed with actual "conspiracy theories", which nevertheless have their metaphorical truth. All of this is due to the compulsion of Ti frame to tie all loose ends together, to forge a coherent narrative about reality, out of an all but infinite number of observed facts, along with the 'collapsing' nature of Ni.
The prediction of the future aspect isn't itself alone quite enough to fully constitute Ni, since any type can take information from the present to make predictions about future outcomes, and if they are intelligent some predictions will be right. (Seeing people type as strong Ni users, especially Ni dominant, because they predict future outcomes is one of the most annoying trends in the ct "community".) Where the Ni aspect really shines is when Jones situates himself in a much larger historical/biological framework, which then becomes part of a cosmology and rumination on the nature of God.
Agree or disagree. Why?
(This link is to a Tucker Carlson interview of Alex Jones on Twitter (X). You now have to be logged in as a member of Twitter to view content.)
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1732 ... 61582?s=20
What is immediately obvious in this Tucker Carlson interview is his ability to predict future outcomes, associated with fully developed Ni. This "prophet" aspect of him is inextricably enmeshed with actual "conspiracy theories", which nevertheless have their metaphorical truth. All of this is due to the compulsion of Ti frame to tie all loose ends together, to forge a coherent narrative about reality, out of an all but infinite number of observed facts, along with the 'collapsing' nature of Ni.
The prediction of the future aspect isn't itself alone quite enough to fully constitute Ni, since any type can take information from the present to make predictions about future outcomes, and if they are intelligent some predictions will be right. (Seeing people type as strong Ni users, especially Ni dominant, because they predict future outcomes is one of the most annoying trends in the ct "community".) Where the Ni aspect really shines is when Jones situates himself in a much larger historical/biological framework, which then becomes part of a cosmology and rumination on the nature of God.
Agree or disagree. Why?
(This link is to a Tucker Carlson interview of Alex Jones on Twitter (X). You now have to be logged in as a member of Twitter to view content.)
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1732 ... 61582?s=20