Carl Sagan, science popularizer

Post Reply
User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Carl Sagan, science popularizer

Post by Roshan »

Type him.



Last edited by Roshan on Wed Apr 24, 2024 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vincent
Posts: 1102
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 3:37 pm
Location: Near Versailles, France
Enneagram Core: 9w8
Cognitive Type: NiFe

Re: Carl Sagan, science popularizer

Post by Vincent »

Okay so...

ct wise everything here confirms the impression i had a few years ago that he was TeSi.

Enneagram-wise i suspect he leads with 3w4(2w3).
Head seems to be gluttonous and assertive enough for 7w6(6w5), rather than 6w7(5w6),which would have been my intial guess when i looked at the ct back then.

Now i'm not sure about the gut and the stacking. There is something very One-ish about him, but i suspect it comes from an so/sp stacking rather than an actual 1 fix. So i would go for that and 9w1(1w2) for the gut.

After all, he DID write some tablets of Moses and send them to travel in Space for Eternity. and there is no highest Mountain that looking at us from Sirius.. and the stack fix correlation with sx Nine makes enough sense to be tempting.

User avatar
Roshan
Phoenix
Posts: 4316
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:47 pm

Re: Carl Sagan, science popularizer

Post by Roshan »

So this is how I typed him, based solely on the first video (and without even paying attention to the content of the whole thing but rather to the 'vibe', because it bored me/I couldn't follow it): 3w42w3-7w66w5-9w11w2. Sound familiar? :thumb:

I made a mistake with the stacking, though. I had sp/so, and it wasn't making sense watching the second video. Whence the blazing eyes? Sure, there is a heavy calibration to Two on his Three, but 3w2 is a Charmer, not a firebrand. Somehow I didn't think of [so/sp]--or note that that blazing had a smoldering sp/sxishness to it. You are certainly right, @vincent, he is [so/sp], and that is probably so/SP--he sure did nicely for himself financially--and this is what a not specifically high level [so/sp] 379 Smooth Operator/Wizard of Odds is like.

I did not have a problem with the Nine from the get go. I just 'knew' it was Nine. BUT I couldn't say why. And even less could I say why it wasn't One. But energetics were confirmed in the second video in the way he came out and went to his seat and just the all around smooth operatorness of the whole thing. So then I could say why--and now with [so/sp], the Oneish stacking, it's even easier to. But at first, after just the first video, I couldn't, and that was why I posted him.

See, he popped up in a photo in a post on facebook and I thought, having Sofie the Deceiver hanging over me, hmmm, looks like another 3w42w3. I better check him out. (Believe it or not, I never saw him on camera ever, whether still or moving. I know, I know.) And then I did check him out and had the same problem with him that I had with Sofie. I just knew it was Nine but couldn't say why, and, more naggingly, why not One?

Now I'm thinking the solution, or at least part of the solution, with Sofie is the same as with Sagan--they're both counterflow, and I'm starting to think she may be SP/sx Ascetic, so pulling on [so/sp]. After all, one might nickname Sofie Soapy, she is soapy clean. And that, and only that, is why I briefly went with their typing of her of [sp/so].
Last edited by Roshan on Thu Apr 25, 2024 7:48 am, edited 3 times in total.

Post Reply