Karl Ove Knausgaard

[Roshan]

We discussed him in the group chat while watching a video interview. The discussion emerged out of my observation that Ingmar Bergman is so chill for a 469 in some order, and that it seems to have some relationship to a cultural billboarding of "Fourishness" in the arts (with its concomitant "billboarding NOT") that goes back at least to Strindberg, Ibsen, Hansen, Munch, Dreier, and many more, I'm sure, in Scandinavia.

Bergman himself seems to have been both a product of this tradition and a cornerstone of its most modern incarnation, and a partisan of billboarding NOT in his everyday parlance, for which reason David Gray ascribed him sp/so 9w1, (which seems a bit far-fetched, regardless of 4w5 fix).

I found this article by Knausgaard in the New York Times. Hopefully you can read it now. NYT has a maximum allowable free reads per month. It seems to shed light on both Knausgaard's type and the ongoing Scandinavian cultural phenomenon in the arts.

And more. It raises questions about 4, and specifically about The Hole at the Bottom of the E. v. the hole in the Eye of the Hurricane of the triple attached Churner. It specifically addresses the "hide/reveal" that Don associated with Four only. There is a lot of grist here for the mill in the ongoing obnoxious, onerous task of understanding 4--what it is, and probably more importantly, what it isn't.

Knaussgard writes to achieve an identity, period; moreover, he knows it. Once a Four fix enters the picture, it can't end there. Four evokes and expresses archetypal Identity itself. And Four is a true believer in it too, even on a triple attached Six lead. Especially one that's sx/sp.

My typing for him atm (non-primary wings very tentative) would be sx/sp 6w55w4-9w81w9-3w42w3.

[Roshan]

The video we watched.

[Vincent]

This video isn't avaiable for me.

But i think i found it on dailymotion :